Bayer One A Day men’s multivitamin threatened with lawsuit over misleading health claims
If you are a man over 50, you’ve likely seen ads for Bayer One A Day men’s multivitamins that claimed the mineral selenium helps reduce risk of prostate cancer or otherwise promotes “prostate health.”
There’s a big problem however: It’s not true.
In fact, for most men, taking too much selenium may actually promote more aggressive forms of prostate cancer. And, previous studies warned against supplementing with selenium since men taking selenium developed more cases of diabetes than men in control groups who did not.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest has threatened Bayer with a lawsuit over those claims, and just last month, we asked the Food and Drug Administration to seize existing stockpiles of One A Day Men’s Health Formula and One A Day Men’s 50+ Advantage.
As CSPI senior nutritionist David Schardt said at the time, “Bayer is exploiting men’s fear of prostate cancer just to sell more pills.” And, a group of some of the most prominent prostate cancer researchers in the country wrote that “Bayer Healthcare is doing a disservice to men by misleading them about a protective role for selenium in prostate cancer.”
If you purchased either of these One A Day Men’s Multis on the belief the product would help reduce your risk of prostate cancer or promote better prostate health, we would like to hear from you. Please email us at cwalsh@cspinet.org so we can learn about your experience with One A Day men’s multis. Together, we may be able to help other men from being ripped off by Bayer’s misleading and illegal claims.
Sincerely,
Steve Gardner
Director of Litigation
Center for Science in the Public Interest
S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford’s lies catching up to him?

As previously reported by Fox News (www.tinyurl.com/m226qc), S.C. Govenor Sanford was reportedly seen in “in and out of” the infamous Bunny Ranch brothel in Carson City, Nevada “over the last several days.” Now a report from WYFF in Greenville, SC seems to indicate the Govenor was seen returning from the airport, not the trail. Read the full story below from WTFF.com. This seems to corroborate the siting of him at a location other than on the hiking trail.
S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford “missing” at Nevada Bunny Ranch brothel?

Mark Sanford; South Carolina
COLUMBIA, South Carolina (FOX) – Gov. Mark Sanford will return to his office Wednesday following widespread confusion over his whereabouts, a spokesman for the South Carolina Republican said.
Joel Sawyer, Sanford’s communication’s director, also said in a statement the governor called his chief of staff Tuesday morning and was “somewhat taken aback by all of the interest this trip has gotten.”
The mystery surrounding his whereabouts was called into question after Fox News reported he was visiting a friend in Nevada. Several sources within the infamous Bunny Ranch brothel in Carson City, Nevada stated the Governor was seen “in and out of the establishment over the last several days.”
“I apologize for taking so long to send this update, and was waiting to see if [we had] a more definitive idea of what part of the trail he was on before we did so,” Sawyer said in an e-mail to reporters.
Sanford’s whereabouts were unaccounted for Monday when he stepped out of the public eye following a bruising session with the state Legislature. Even his wife, Jenny, said she did not know where he was, The Associated Press reported, according to The State newspaper in Columbia, South Carolina.
“I want to emphasize that this isn’t something that either staff or Mrs. Sanford is concerned about,” Sawyer wrote Monday night. “As we said earlier today, it isn’t unusual for the governor to be out of pocket for several days after the legislative session. We knew that he would be difficult to reach, and that he would be checking in infrequently. Given the media attention this has generated, we’ll obviously update you once we have some more specifics to pass along.”
Earlier, Sawyer told FOX in a statement, “Before leaving last week, he let staff know his whereabouts and that he’d be difficult to reach. Should any emergencies arise between the times in which he checks in, our staff would obviously be in contact with other state officials as the situation warrants before making any decisions.”
Sawyer did not address Jenny Sanford’s comments to FOX News report.
Octuplet Mom says she’s not done having babies

Octuplet mother Nadya Suleman said on Fox News Friday that she is not done having babies.
“I hope to use some of the donations people give me to move into a bigger house, buy a car, and prepare myself for a future pregnancy.”
Reporter: Are you saying you want to have more children in addition to your 8 newborns?
“I hope so, god willing. I need the generous people in this country to donate just a couple of dollars each and that should be enough to pay for another in vitro fertilization sometime later this year.”
Reporter: How will you support them, do you have a job?
“Not right now but between public assistance and donations, my right to be a mother will be fulfilled”
Reporter: What do you have to say to the people who say you already too many children?
“It’s my right to have as many children as I want. That’s why they call it public assistance. It’s not like there’s a law against having children.”
The value of a human life – $5K or $2.6K?
I read two articles in the last couple of days that contrast what value two entities place on a human life. The first is the $5,000 each passenger of the US Airways flight that flew into the Hudson River will receive for the incident. As of now each will receive reimbursement of the ticket and $5K for “immediate needs”. That is not to say the passengers won’t get more but that’s all that’s been discussed publicly so far. http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-01-26-us-airways-river-crash_N.htm
Next is the amount relatives in Afghanistan will receive after U.S. forces were responsible for “accidentally killing” civilians during an operation. There were 15 people killed in the raid and the U.S. is paying a total of $40K. This amounts to $2,666 for each person killed. Granted this is a war zone, and sometimes collateral damage or death is a necessary evil during wartime. It’s also important to consider that the Afghani people are accustomed to a very small or non-existent income so $2.6K is a probably more that they will make in several lifetimes. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28878989/
Despite these differences, the fact remains that U.S. Airways is willing to pay more to a living passenger for their Hudson River ordeal than the U.S. govt. is willing to pay for killing the wrong Afghani people in a raid. I’m not saying it’s right or wrong but it certainly shows what value we have for human life. Not much.
Please post your comments.



